In his encyclical “Laudato Si”, Bergoglio falls within the worst currents of global environmentalism. Even though it doesn’t exist, the lie of “global warming is consecrated as dogma. The eco- theology that it uses takes elements from the extreme ecology of the New Age Movement. With a Marxist analysis, the Encyclical gratuitously opposes the marginalised from the peripheries with ecocidal transnationals.

The document was presented by Joachim Schellnhuber, promoter of World Government and population reduction.

The Encyclical “Laudato Si” is unfortunate not only because there are much more urgent topics for the church at this time but because it favours a series of false and harmful social concepts for mankind.

Firstly, the document is based on a completely erroneous thesis that the planet is suffering from “global warming”. The document says: “A very consistent scientific consensus exists which indicates that we are witnessing a worrying warming of the climate system. If anything does not exist it is precisely a “scientific consensus”. Quite the contrary.

The lie of “global warming” was created in an illuminist-Zionist atmosphere to justify a series of global measures such as carbon taxes on fossil fuels, etc... and, especially, measures to reduce world “overpopulation” which supposedly is the cause of the aforementioned “overheating”.

On the 21st of November 2009, an incident known as “climategate” or the “great scandal of the century” occurred. A hacker broke into the Climate Research Unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia, England, and took possession of more than a thousand emails that showed how the “scientists” at this centre had spent thirteen years lying and manipulating temperature records to get people to believe in global warming. This centre provides temperature analysis to the whole world.

In a private email, Professor Phil Jones, head of the CRU, tells of the preparation of a figure for a declaration by the World Meteorological Organization on global climate status in 1999. He writes: “I’ve just completed Mike’s nature trick of adding in the real temperatures to each series for the past 20 years to hide the decrease”.

Against what these pseudo scientists postulated for so many years and which helped to create the great myth, there is evidence that shows the opposite: the planet has been cooling in these past decades. Not only are we having colder winters and freezing phenomena which didn’t previously exist. There is also scientific data, such as that produced by the probe TIMED, launched into space by NASA, to measure the annual variation in atmospheric temperature, which show the opposite of the “warming” myth.

TIMED means “Thermosphere, Ionosphere, Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics”. It is a probe launched by NASA on the 7th of December 2001 to measure the temperatures of the ionosphere, the mesosphere and the lower thermosphere of the earth’s athmosphere. Eight years later, the probe produced two important consistent and revealing pieces of data: planet earth is cooling, and this cooling is due to variations in the solar cycle. In other words, there is no global warming and nothing to do with the “human cause” postulated by the environmentalists and agents of world government.

In December of 2009, a month after the “scandal of the century” of the CRU was published, John Coleman, the founder of Weather Channel, together with 30,000 scientists, denounced Al Gore for fraud, for dedicating his Foundation, “The Climate Project” to disseminate the lie of global warming around the world.

Another lie, which was added to the first, is that the supposed warming is anthropogenic, i.e. caused by human overpopulation. This is where the agents of world government argue that it is necessary to reduce the human species as a matter of survival. Overheating, a scarcity of food, water and space, make it necessary not only to contain population growth, but to reduce it by any means possible.

The environmental flag which justifies the reduction of world population is not only sponsored by the UNO, but also by private foundations for this globalist cause. One of the most scandalous presentations during the world climate summit held in Cancun in 2010, was that of Ted Turner, founder magnate of CNN. There he openly declared that “it is necessary to reduce the population, from 7 or 8 thousand million inhabitants that we have today, to 2 thousand million”. Bill Gates, the Microsoft guru, who carries out massive vaccination campaigns, especially in Africa (from which have emerged modern designer diseases) has declared that “if we do a good job with new vaccinations, reproductive health services, medical attention, perhaps we can reduce the population by 10 or 15 per cent”. Joachim Shellnhuber, founder of the Institute for Climate Change, who was asked by Bergoglio to present his encyclical in the Vatican, has stated that it is necessary to reduce world population from 7 thousand million to one and a half.

The second lamentable element of Bergoglio’s encyclical is his retake on concepts taken from the New Age. This train of thought has its most remote roots in the Theosophical Society of the Russian spiritist Helena Blavatsky. In 1885 she wrote her “Secret Doctrine” in which she configured the plan of World Government and a world religion, objectives born of Illuminist masonry.

An essential element of the New Age is the theme of extreme ecology, which is a modern form of pantheism, which postulates the figure of “Sister Earth” or Gaia the “Mother Earth”, and the idea of “energy” which flows through nature and living beings.

Anthropomorphisms such as “Sister Earth”, used in the Encyclical, even if they were only metamorphical, prepare the way for the imposition of “The Earth Charter”, a future “Constitution” of World Government designed to substitute the tablets of the Ten Commandments. The Charter, which today has the status of a “soft law”, will serve as a basis for linked documents to be adopted by governments as part of a global “Ethic”.

Laudato Si, quite apart from creating an awareness of the duty of taking care of the planet, can become an instrument of ideological manipulation by those who wish to impose world religion and world government owing to these three dangerous elements.

As the great theologian Moltmann would say: If the Bible becomes ecological, man stops being the centre and sovereign of the world, and he becomes the latest arrival on an earth where he is a tenant. This is a complete change of faith regarding the vision of man.

The eco-theology which inspires Bergoglio’s Encyclical is not based on the Divine mandate “Multiply and dominate the Earth” (Gen, 9-7), it is based on an ideology that is totally opposed to this Divine mandate.